Saturday, December 10, 2011

FOX news publishes False Poll to support Newt Gingrich

The most recent other FOX immigration poll showed oppositon to Newt and Zogby Standard Polls shows NO support for immigrants etc.. :

http://www.zogby.com/news/2010/04/28/zogby-interactive-large-majority-opposes-equal-rights-for-illegal-immigrants-but-support-human-right/

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/52_support_arizona_like_immigration_law_in_their_state

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/new_high_65_oppose_automatic_citizenship_for_children_born_here_to_illegal_immigrants


http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/most_voters_oppose_public_schooling_tuition_breaks_driver_s_licenses_for_illegal_immigrants


FOX and Lame Stream news fraudulent and narrow Push Poll shows support contradicted by every other professional poll:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/09/fox-news-poll-voters-back-plan-to-citizenship-for-illegal-immigrants/

http://www.nationaljournal.com/daily/public-wants-immigrants-to-be-able-to-stay-20111206


Numbers USA asks why these new push polls are emerging, and why they are not mentioning attrition options instead of deportation in these polls ?
https://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/beckr/december-13-2011/our-op-ed-hill-questions-media-blackout-attrition-option.html


See the conspiracy ? FOX and their ilk create a false dilemna in which the only two options are mass deportation and legalization / amnesty, without asking about birth-right citizenship or attrition through enforcement etc... It seems FOX is desperate to support Liberal GOP candidate Newt Gingrich.

UPDATE: Fox has removed the comments section of their latest propaganda piece. I wonder Why ?


It also seems that he is suffering badly in the polls, unlike what FOX says in their fantasy world, and keep in mind even if the dirt does not get out to the primary voters, it will come out in a general election from the DNC:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/2012_presidential_matchups

Friday, December 2, 2011

Nixon Peace Activist convo Tapes released. Do you think the GOP will be like Nixon and join OWS for ending the Wars ? Or police state crackdown.

Nixon Peace Activist convo Tapes released. Do you think the GOP will be like Nixon and join OWS for ending the Wars ? Or police state crackdown.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/white_house/july-dec11/nixontapes_11-25.html

If you answered police state, crackdown and more wars, you are probably right. The GOP is no Nixon. Nixon knew when to quit. And even back then he was against the Kahmer Rouge and NVA, actual hard core maoist movements killing many, not chasing ghosts and obsessing over tin pot nations in deserts of no consequence to us. More threatening enemies even to just the region they were in the 60's. In the end we definitely survived.

Even in this time the of the cold war, the GOP did not order suspension of Posse Comatatus and the constitution. The neo cons who were then the protestors benefited greatly in their hippie outfits preaching marxists Leninism from that decision. But now the neo cons today, defending the establishment of their making has manipulated good men to wrong. And Newt Gingrich was playing with campus Nudy pictures dodging the draft around this time.

Now i'm sure there will be more bi partisanship and Obama and GOP mysteriously agree to bomb some middle eastern nation after this message. Beeeep............But i have been there and done that yawn.....

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Is Newt Gingrich A Genocidal Slave Driver ?

Gingrich has got to go. It's Time. That's it.!

Newt Gingrich immigration program is a disaster. It does nothing to help people but rather creates even more unemployment. It is basically a repeat of the failed 1986 amnesty but no path to citizenship and much worse. You need to do everything in your power to defeat Newt gingrich. He is deceptive and will destroy this country, even more than Obama with his jobs killing and unfair programs. You may even need Radical third party alternatives, but I hope not.

He does not mention once any time of mandatory employer verification system, but merely a guest worker program, so not only can a business hire legal sub standard labor, but also continue to hire illegal labor. He say greater penalty, but it is already illegal to hire an illegal from the '86 law, so what difference would a penalty make, and what would the point be if the employer had no easy verification system, or a mandatory one  ? The businesses would just ignore the guest worker program and continue to hire illegal anyway. Furthermore, why sponsor a guest worker program in the economy anyway ?


I also dont't see great value in English only as an official language proposal coming from Gingrich, most states have a law like that anyway. And with the massive numbers of guest workers and immigrants he wants to bring in, that would be detrimental to have english only, because the workers do speak spanish and will anyway. Newt would also never apply English only where it counts like the voting right act provision for bi lingual ballots etc.. Although English only on the federal level well done by someone like Dr Paul would be beneficial and avoid the snags.



His website calls for teaching immigrants history, but they are already taught "history". This can do nothing. Furthermore, I would imagine the history they are taught is Newt's version of PC non sense. I doubt they would pick up a book and See Eisenhower, FDR, or Huber's immigration policy which is not too "compassionate". Newt Certainly left that out in his falsified version of events. That policy is merely a clever disguise to mask the fact that illegal alien children cost the tax payer billions, and with his guest worker program, the states would be mandated to pick up the tab even more. Furthermore, once again he contradicts himself with such a policy when he says he is against the DOE and any mandate on the states against the 10th Ammendmant.

I also think the idea of allowing young illegals to join the military is absurd. In this economy people with misdemeanors or even a dismissed felony for harassment, ADD, a bad knee or something are being tunred away for service. Why now allow illegal aliens to join the military ? Is this a sign that perpetual warfare is sacrosanct and if you join some REMF unit in the military the illegal is magically equal to people like me and my family who fought in most of these country's majors wars past and present in the military ? I don't think so. Illegal immigrants children also have a higher ASVAB failure rate. Do you want the US military to be the French foreign legion ? Or is illegal aliens in the military some tool to terrorize american citizens so they can be used in the indefinite detention programs and FEMA camps in this country in case a sufficient number of Whites refuse to partake. ? There is also the fact the certain MOS require citizenship anyway,as illegals and non citizens can rarely get a security clearance. not to mention the fact that this idea DOES contradict his other promise not to put illegals at the front of the line for citizenship.


His amnesty program is also absurd. It might not even be legal to create a slave caste with no citizen or welfare rights. he also says that a person who has been in the usa 25 or more years should not be deported or an old lady. But why would an old not want Social security and assistance or prove they are not dependent on welfare, that by default screens out the elderly and sick and leaves the younger "rootless" types with amnesty. And the 24 year rule also means any illegal from 1990 to present gets to stay here. The 11 million prsently here is also a lie, there are far more. There is also the fact that even a small amnesty for some means millions. And an amnesty program would cost billions and anger many communities who are against this causing further division. Allowing a community to decide the law is also basically mob rule. Why not let the community decide what to do with all criminals then ? He also says all illegal aliens get amnesty until congress creates an amnesty program. That invalidates all law enforcement placing people in danger and negates the state anti-immigrant laws he claims to support. And eventually the illegals amnestied wether he likes or not via democrat executive order or the next dem administration as the apparatus is already in place easy.Mexicans can also just leave to their home right next door. What state do we have ?

His humanitarian concerns are bogus. He is basically creating a class of slaves like his southern ancestors probably did. His humanitarian concern is just the desires of the chamber of commerce and nothing more. And to say his party is the party of the family ignores all the suicides, divorces, widows etc.. caused by the wars which he has no problem with and ignore the old GOP policy under eisenhower ( funny he mentions ww2 in his plan) which systematically deported them and kept them at bay until the late 70's. He also didn't object to child labor amongst other things. His references to reagan are also absurd. He admits the 86 amnesty was a failure. There were also fare fewer illegals at the time and Reagan said it was a one time deal. Even the pope says illegals can be deported. Reagan also gave a pro-waffen SS speech with US ww2 vets at Bitburg Airbase in Germany in the 80's and went to Alabam and talked about states rights at a famous civil rights landmark. He also almost refues to honor MLK and continued funding to apartheid south Africa. Reagan also dealt with a democratic controlled congress in 86. What about that Reagan ? And if you want to talk American historical figures why not Go back To Jefferson or don't go there at all ? Furthermore, Humanitarian Aid with repatriation can be considered as a cheaper alternative to amnesty.

I am also disgusted that he presents a false dilemma by saying they all need to be deported or amnestied. One must do neither, but rather attrition through enforcement. Employer sanctions and E-verify, empower the states, cut funding for sanctuary cities, end birth right citizenship,  etc..They will leave automatically. Not to mention the fact that he is saying :we have to deport" as if anyone was trying, in light of his plan would it not be better to even do nothing than pay so much to set up deportation systems for a limited number of people, then have to supposedly deport the rest afterwards anyway ?

His legal immigration programs are also horrible. Not only did the bipartisan Jordan comission reccomend drastic cuts in the 90's under his watch, but that was in a GOOD economy. There is no shortage of engineers in this country, but beyond that he wants to give foreign grads green cards for the popular majors lie business which is an attack on my family and friends at an at an individual level. And while giving so many foreigners green cards after college, he does nothing about if not promote affirmative action, which burdens and undermines excllence in many top schools thus helping to create any "brain shortage". White students will be locked out of most higher ed and all americans will face a flooded job market after graduation. There is also no shortage of computer programmers or many of those industries he mentions. H1B is also a fraud and a source of illegal immigration. He also says nothing about the 1.5 million legal immigrants who come every year and often go on welfare. That was recommended to be reduced by the Jordan commision. And even John Mccain was talking substantial legal immigration cuts when he was promoting amnesty. Temporary legal status for illegal kids also means possible college enrollment which is the same as the dream act.

The border emphasis is also absurd. Fences are ineffective. The mains source of illegals are visa overstays, something he wants more of and wants to do nothing about. A secure border will do nothing as long as there is an employment and welfare magnet which he wants to leave in place. He also shiftes the guest worker burden on to the tax payer and expands government with these programs.The guest workers will have anchor babies here, their kkids must also be subsidizes in public schools by local communities according to federal law. That contradicts his balanced budget ammendmant and pledge for low taxes and even contradicts the Krebbs card plan he likes.

I also think he is a total hypocrite of poor personal qualities. He lives in a very wealthy predominantly White area of GA, but does not believe anyone else should obviously. He talks down on the confederates for slavery, but promotes it himself both in China and here with illegal labor. His knowledge of history obviously stinks. He says he is pro-family but had countless extramartial affairs. He changed his positon more times than Romney or anyone. He promotes affirmative action, but won't step down from his professor job as an older white male and allow a Black or latino preferential treatment to get that position. He sounds more like Ted Kennedy than anyone. He is probably be extorted right now with all the baggage he has. He also is a obese. Worst of all he uses guilt trips to coerce people into supporting his policies while lying about his true intentions.

He also supported Kosovo independence and even advocates NATO supression and bombing of Serbia, even keeping out Serbs from their traditional lands with border guards and barbed wire. However what about the right-wing groups that may wish to have a separate homeland in north America to escape actual real genocidal policies he imposes ? Zogby was reporting 23% want secession in north America peacefully. How does he feel about them ? He also wrote a book promoting the concept of corporate globalism in which nations don't exist but only business zones in addition to the horrible immigration policies.But supports israel with 8 million. If someone can get together enough people who want a peacful homeland in north America would could they be granted such ? Why it be wrong or not preferable ?

I also think the idea of a "Latino vote" is absurd. They are a very small part of the electorate. Many hispanics are very proud of their country of origin while living in America. There are also stark differences between Latin ethnic groups like Cubans and Argentinians who are mostly White Mexicans and El Salvadorians etc.. I know from personal experience with my Argentinian and Cuban friends and Mexicans and Salvadorians I know not to get them confused. And many states have voter ID now.And if they so important, why not just enforce the damn immigration laws instead of amnesty and pass ore voter id laws. etc.. It is also counter productive to pander to them and promote their ethnic identities. It only forces them to be more anti-america. I also think democracy is failing as most polls show the public against immigration, but nothing is done but betrayal and inaction. There seems to be no difference between the two parties. It has a elitist polyarchy at best, and dictatorship at worst sadly.Furthermore, how would a pro-immigration president carry Ohio, PA, or AZ which are Reagan dem country ?

Even the democrats are praising Gingrich and they will praise him even more with Ads in key states in 2012. I sure as hell won't vote for him and many others won't while he advocates genocide. He is far behind Obama in polls. He has immigration endorsements from Gutierrez D-il La Raza, DNC, and even copies Obama administrative amnesty policies. etc.. I think it would even be better for Newt not do anything about immigration besides let the states do their job, if God Forbid he gets to office. That would be the End of this nation. I wonder how those chamber of commerce types that think it is ok to go against the majority and actually write America's immigration laws would feel if their voting cattle walked away and actually had a credible third party or seceeded ?

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/11/29/9099594-house-democrat-calls-gingrichs-immigration-remarks-step-in-right-direction


A terrorist law from newt because that is what he is:
http://www.newt.org/solutions/immigration


PS. if you think their is a labor shortage ?What happened to chain gangs picking fruits and convict labor ? Or even meanignful welfare reform that forces people to do any job ?







The US Citizens he does not care about:

Monday, November 21, 2011

Why are Republicans scared of Occupy Wall Street ? Most could be sex partners.

Michele Bachmann And Glenn Beck were on the radio talking about "big bad occupy wall street" and how we need to nuke iran, and self identified as a zionist literally and calling herself a "christian". I wonder if they are deliberately deceptive or grossly misinformed especially on their bizzare fear of occupy wall street.

Are you anti-OWS types afraid that they may take over and institute a racist anti white government with discriminatory hiring and aid practices ? That sounds alot like the current government which many of you seem to approve of due to the fact that you have ignored the issue, even when it is more unpopular than anytime in history. No ?

Are you afraid that Occupy wall street might take over the government and create an extraordinary liberal one with tons of social programs and keep taxes high, still running a trillion and trillions dollar deficit ? No, we already have that and the GOP approves. 

Are you afraid they might put the currency in the hands of a private central bank that just sh*ts money that is basically worthless ? We already have the FED bank. You guys already have that. And Bachmann is cute saying we need a gold standard, but didn't mention the FED. :-)

Are you afraid that OWS will bring 1.5 million foreigners legally every year that live in ghettos and displace the traditional population mostly all voting for socialism adding to the OWS ranks ? Open the nation up to invasion and give them birth right citizenship ? We already have that silly. Who cares about 70% or "99%" against that ? Right comrades ? Maybe even bring 1 billion people here destroying the environment ? 

Are you afraid that they will regulate the free market and destroy capitalism ? Hey Hey, we got plenty of that. We have crony capitalism too. 


Are you afraid they will set up a police state with surveillance and internet regulation, violation of the constitution ? We have already have that including the patriot act and such. Thank you W. 

So What the Hell are you afraid of GOP ??? 

oh, could it be that they are not blood thirsty and are opposed to war. ? That is very very very bad. 2 million dead is not enough. I guess. 

So, GOP tell me why you are scared of occupy wall street. You should arrange a 60's style hippie style LGBT, feminist and sexual liberation advocacy orgy. Some swinging etc.. You guys are close and the morals of Cain and Newt are right up there I guess. And you don't need to bring your own tents, you can just...invite them to the white house. I am sure as you are the "men/ women with power" for all those with that fetish. ;-)




Here are some real non hypocritical Jews doing the right thing at Occupy Wall Street:

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Why I now support Legalized Marijuana in the USA like Dr. Ron Paul

Why I changed my mind and support Marijuana Legalization like Ron Paul 


Marijuana or "Ganja" as they call it. is a hot topic, often discussed, but unfortunately not discussed enough or in the right context. Marijuana is a drug that is consumed. It produces effects similar to intoxication. I personally have not used like many advocates for decriminalization and i'm "straight edge". Although I am very right-wing, I support the legalization after the study Ron Paul ideology. Some support legalization, while others do not and although a ban presently exists, there are strong reasons for dismantling these laws rather than allow this prohibition to continue. I support the decriminalization for practical, ethical and scientific reasons etc..

First of all the argument that marijuana is inherently and purely unhealthy is false. Marijuana is actually is just like cigarettes, inhaled from smoke. But without the nicotine and added ingredients and addiction. It is also completely organic and natural. It has proven medical benefits for patients. It is even rated less harmful than alcohol or tobacco by many world renowned researchers. The effects are also temporary like intoxication. And studies about addiction or long term damage are inconclusive at worst. The gateway drug idea is also redciulous, which is like saying alcohol is a gateway drug. I know a girl from school that smokes it and she WOULD NEVER stick a heroine need into her body or snort coke. Marijuana can also be eaten in brownies as a snack with less effect or harm than tobacco or alcohol.

And when we consider the topic of cigarettes, why do we not consider the special interest groups that suppress the legalization of the drug ? The tobacco companies spend millions supporting candidates who support them and not legalization. John Behoner in particular, a tough opponent of legalization was passing out tobacco checks on the house floor. The DARE campaign as you may know is against "drugs", including marijuana, but they refuse to point to the dangers of tobacco as it is funded by big tobacco. The Tobacco and other corporate collusion against Marijuana is one of the sadest examples of crony capitalism on earth.

In addition the the Big Tobacco imposed restrictions of no value, the "moral" arguments do not hold weight. In christianity there are numerous examples of ancient Jews and christians using the drug. I also question the christian idea that marijuana is bad, while alcohol is ok. Some muslims also interpret the Koran to allow Hashish and not Alcohol. Many Ancient people's of the biblical and ancient era also used such as the indo-europeans scythians. cannabis plants have been found in Egypt with mummies etc.. Shakespere and many Western figures have also used Cannabis. In the USA and West Cannabis only became illegal in the 1900's when the Temprance movement emerged and Big Tobacco was growing much bigger.


The federal Ban on marijuana is something small government conservatives need to oppose, especially the Tea Party. The "war on drugs" has cost the government millions and contributed the deficit tremendously. It has violated constitutional rights. The beauracracy to fight the drug has expanded the federal government and created agencies such as the DEA. The goals and purpose of the war on drugs are questionable. Why would it be necessary to exterminate an entire species of plant or raid the home of someone with a single plant of pot in their home ? And even if one supports big government is a pot plant our priority over fighting the Al Quaida you claim to be so concerned about ? Mant Law enforcement personnel also want to see the drug legalized. Lives are also destroyed everyday and our prisons overflow because people use it.

The anti-matijuana laws have also had no effect and even negative effects. Growing up and in college marijuana was just as common as cigarettes if not more. It is also not impossible if not terribly easy to get marijuana. All one needs to do is get seeds and some dirt and water, wallah. Drug cartels and the underground economy has also emerged from the strict marijuana laws, which threatens many people. Many marxist paramilitary governments and armies like FARC and the FNC are funded by drug sales to the USA. The Taliban was also getting rich selling it to us etc..Prohibition was a disaster and so is criminalization of marijuana. Once the underground economy dissapears, the drug money would not flow to mexico and cartels but stay in our economy. Making marijuana illegal also means that the law cannot focus on severely harmful drugs like Heroine.

The effects and benefits of legalization would be enormous. Besides increasing freedom, ending drug crimes etc.. it would help people medically, economically, socially. People can solve their medical and social problems with it. It would also aid in job creation. Many people can become entrepreneurs, grow small businesses and be employed in related industries like hemp factories and farms. Garden shops and potteries would also flourish. Doctors could give low income people needing care marijuana instead of anti-depressants and tranquilizers. It would also increase tourism tremendously. The US also needs to compete with countries that have already started legalization like the Netherlands, Canada, etc.. The GOP could also have a social just / diversity / LGBT positive issue in supporting legalization, something they seem to want to be these days. OWS also supports legalization.

The legalization process can be done in a slow and good way. The anti-marijuana laws on the FEDERAL level need to get tossed. The states that want to get regulate can either by banning, or state licensing, which ensures people can get legal drugs and safe drugs. Communities that wish to ban would have more authority to do so, while those favoring less restriction can have none. There is also the hypocrisy of the fact that a state MUST enforce FEDERAL drug laws, but a state like AZ or AL can't even enforce the federal immigration law. And even Lincoln Chaffee types would jump in against AZ and AL. etc..We should wonder why if Sodomy is a constitutional right to privacy , why not a puff which does NOT give you AIDs HIV chances and such ?? LOGIC ??

The process of legalization has already begun. Many states have ballot initiatives to allow the citizens to decide their own drug laws that pass. Medical Marijuana is now becoming more popular. Obama has even flirted with the idea of legalization. Ron PAul has also brought in legislation with congressman barney Frank which shows repeal of the anti-marijuana laws would be both bi-partisan and diverse. Polls also show widespread support for legalization, even in nations such as Canada. It is a winning issue for all. You also need to overcome the idea that marijuana is "taboo" from years of indoctrination by Big Tobacco, media And party orthodoxy.

In conclusion, hemp is not so bad. I don't use it but believe it should be legalized. It is for our constitutional rights. It is for limited government. It is for less crime. Decriminalization is politically advantageous and popular. The decriminalization is bi-partisan. It would also create jobs and help everyone.


How it works in smoke form from NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg8wrzmIdyI

Congressman Paul (R-TX) and Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA)  support legalization:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHBCsPYuKIs

Economist and world famous Investor Peter Schiff wants legalization:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3hfDyEJsxA

Most People Support Legalization in polls:


Other sponsors of Marijuana freedom: Governor and GOP presidential candidate Gary Johnson of New Mexico, Navy Seal, celebrity and Governor Jesse Ventura of Minesotta, Dr and Senator Rand Paul, DR Ron Paul, congressman Frank of MA and DNC, California doctors association, US. Surgeon General Elders, 


Tuesday, November 15, 2011

LA NOIR : non PC fun for White Nationalists ?

What an Amazing Non PC discovery I have found. Get it for your children.

So, I have an X Box and from time to time I like to play video games. I prefer historically themed games, crime / law, some military shooters, RPG,s strategy, etc..I am quite knowledgeable about these games. But recently my Steam account stopped working, thus my favorite game 'til now Shogun total war 2 stopped as well. thus I am back to x box and have purchased an awesome game called "LA Noire" from Rockstar games. This game is all round great, and surprisingly non PC.

Full Trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYym1U226M

The game starts in 1947-1950 in LA. It is a free roam style game, so you can wander around. The city Of LA is recreated along with the original historical cars, weapons and every other item you can think of. Your character is a detective and WW2 USMC Pacific theatre veteran, a lieutenant from the 6th Marine Battalion , who is notorious for a mysterious massacre on Okinawa. Occasional you see flashbacks from his experiences on screen such as storming a Japanese Artillery position. He also earned a silver star. He is now top cop in the LAPD. He rises through the ranks to detective working various cases ranging from Traffic to Arson. The main organized criminals are the Jewish Mafia lead by Mikey Cohen. The cases are based on history and include Hollywood child sex rings, serial killers, insurance fraud, Arson-murder, Morphine addiction, large plots and conspiracies etc.. You also can stop street crimes that often end up in car chases or shoot outs on the street. Although crimes are still present, much less in number than today, which is also reflected in the game.

Flashbacks:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib4IvBq7Vhc

The game's Historical detail not only in the geography and technology but the demographics and social situation as well is astounding . In post war LA, almost every man is a veteran from the pacific theater. There is alot of racial awareness in society. The Us immigration laws are still based on ethnic quotas, so there are very few asians or Latinos in the city, and Few Blacks mainly in WATTS, so the 1947 demographic profile leaves LA about 90% White and with a small statewide population. The Police also and society also have no problem calling people racial names, and the official term for a Black person is not African American, but rather just Negro. There is also fighting between Jews against christians. Communists are also picked up and charged with other crimes.

Leftist Jew interrogated by PD :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObOU4troQBE&feature=related

The Political and social situation is also well documented. On your car radio you hear original old news broadcasts relating to the Red Scare, Joe Mccarthy and HUAC investigating Hollywood. Truman also speaks on the radio, along with other politicians, and surprisingly they pray in speeches and talk of God. You also hear really nice old songs. You also get global news like the communist take over of poland, Chinese civil war, Homosexuality and adultery are still illegal and due to the easy going demographics, the PD has plenty of time to investigate them. The main character also gets popped / arrested for a extramarital relationship he has with a German woman from Germany who is also a singer and later turns out to have been Nazi in the war and is a heroine in the game.

The Technology differences are well represented in the game and accurate. There are no 2 way radios for police, but rather a one way radio to receive dispatches from the station. To call HQ, you need to use a street phone reserved for Police and fire. There is also amazing detailed weapons from the era to use: the BAR, Thompson with a 50 - 100 round drum mag, the Browning High power pistol, unique for the time with it's 14 round magazine, the 1911 pistol, and the S&W model 10. You can also keep a Ithaca M37 shotgun in you car trunk. Civilians also have weapons and you see them shooting robbers and such. They have the M1 Garand, but unfortunately not the M1 Carbine which would have been ideal for police work but also has 30 round clip. a flamethrower from ww2 also found. There is also brass knuckles and switchblades, plus other weapons you can't use. If you go inside a house, you also see like singer sewing machines and giant wood radios. etc.. Police tactics are also different: more likely to use force, no miranda, harsher interogations. Also the effects are realistic, in that if you shoot someone from close rang with a shotgun their guts explode, but each weapon also has a range for it's caliber. You also need to hit someone in their vital organs or head repeatedly when you shoot them with bulllets, if not they get up again.

This game as GREAt all in all. I think it is comprable if not better than GTA iv, Red Dead Redemption and all in it's class. I cannot stop playing the game even the same case again. I just wish there were hundreds and not like 25 cases. I also like the history. I wish I could live in this era and hope America will be like it was in that time again. But until it gets that way, i'll keep playing XBox...And definitly pick this game up for the kids, as they may learn something good.

Saturday, April 9, 2011

46% of Mississipi Republicans say Interracial should be illegal

Mississippi Republicans think interracial marriage should be illegal

Category: A Conversation About Race, Interracial Marriage|Interracial Sex
Despite constant brainwashing and relentless media propaganda, there still remains a great number of people in Mississippi who adhere to the values of their parents.
We asked voters on this poll whether they think interracial marriage should be legal or illegal- 46% of Mississippi Republicans said it should be illegal to just 40% who think it should be legal.
Keep in mind that this number only represents the number of people who were honest with the individual that conducted the poll. If given an opportunity to actually vote on the matter in private, the percentage would be much higher.
AOL News is also running with the story.
A new poll gauging Mississippi Republicans’ preferences going into the 2012 election ended up revealing something more startling: 46 percent of GOP voters in the state think interracial marriage should be illegal.
Results were announced Thursday by Public Policy Polling, a polling firm based in North Carolina. The company asked 400 Republican primary voters about their preferences for candidates for state and national offices, as well as their views on interracial marriage.
It was only 45 years ago that Mississippi legalized interracial marriage, and this poll indicates it continues to be a controversial subject.
The poll also found that Mississippi Republicans back Haley Barbour, their outgoing governor, to run for president on the GOP ticket in 2012.
(Snip)
The firm also conducted a separate poll of non-Republican voters, asking them the same question about interracial marriage. Those results are expected to be released in the coming weeks, along with those from another PPP poll asking Mississippi voters whether they think the right side — the North or South — won the Civil War.
The media will predictably dismiss the voters of Mississippi as “hicks” and “rednecks,” but their opinion on this matter is perfectly legitimate.
A few years ago, the good people of Mississippi also voted to keep the Confederate flag as part of their official state flag by a whopping 2-1 margin.

http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/jamesedwards/2011/04/08/mississippi-republicans-think-interracial-marriage-should-be-illegal/

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

FPO will snatch victory from Jaws of Defeat and stop mass immigration

I think just like here the Right
-wing Republicans will win, then in Austria to, the right wing parties will win. Polls show people are against mass immigration everywhere and Austria is no exception to the rule. From Arizona to Vienna the anti-mass immigration right will see victory.

Trust poll shocks quarrelling government
The Austrian government has suffered heavily over the level of trust it enjoys, a new poll shows.

Research firm Karmasin found that 67 per cent of Austrians have less trust now in the joint administration of Social Democrats (SPÖ) and the conservative People’s Party (ÖVP) than they had one year ago.

The agency, which spoke to around 500 Austrians for the magazine profil, said 62 per cent of interviewed people were not putting as much trust in banks now as they did in the beginning of last year. The trust in the juridical system of Austria declined by 55 per cent as well, while 61 per cent said they were more dissatisfied with the service and performance of national broadcaster ORF.

Only 11 per cent said the Federal Economy Chamber (WKO) suffered in reputation year on year, whereas 35 per cent told Karmasin they had a worse opinion of insurance agencies than one year ago.

The past few months in the media were dominated by political bickering as the SPÖ-ÖVP coalition’s 2011 budget was criticised as uninspired and unfair by the opposition. The Greens and the Freedom Party (FPÖ) claimed the poorest will be hit hardest by the upcoming tax increases, while Alliance for the Future of Austria (BZÖ) boss Josef Bucher claimed the government "did almost everything wrong" in deciding on measures for next year.

One of the most controversial reforms is the decision to stop paying out family subsidies when children turn 24 instead of 26. Students groups claimed this change increases the pressure on young people trying to make ends meet.

Other disputed measures in the coalition’s bid to lower the soaring state debt are higher mineral oil taxation rates and a new "carbon dioxide tax" on flight tickets.

Political analysts do not expect the coalition to break up early despite the intensifying war of words between SPÖ representatives and ÖVP officials since polls show the right-wing FPÖ would benefit most from a split.

The next general elections are set to take place in 2013. A Karmasin poll showed recently that around one in four Austrians could imagine the FPÖ manages to become the strongest party in the foreseeable future. The party headed by Heinz-Christian Strache garnered 17.5 per cent to come third in the 2008 general ballot.

OGM research showed in December that 20 per cent of Austrians aged under 30 want Strache as chancellor. Only 16 per cent favour ÖVP boss Josef Pröll, while 15 per cent prefer SPÖ Chancellor Werner Faymann.

http://austrianindependent.com/news/Politics/2011-01-04/5834/Trust_poll_shocks_quarrelling_government

Obama Might Sink: New Rules for 2012 Election Straight from ARIZONA

BORN IN THE USA?

Game-changer! Arizona to pass 2012 eligibility law
Obama will have to produce birth certificate to run again

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: January 25, 2011
7:42 pm Eastern


By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WorldNetDaily



It could be a game-changer.

A plan in Arizona to require presidential candidates to prove their eligibility to occupy the Oval Office is approaching critical mass, even though it has just been introduced.

The proposal from state Rep. Judy Burges, who carried a similar plan that fell short last year only because of political maneuvering, was introduced yesterday with 16 members of the state Senate as co-sponsors.

It needs only 16 votes in the Senate to pass.

In the House, there are 25 co-sponsors, with the need for only 31 votes for passage, and Burges told WND that there were several chamber members who confirmed they support the plan and will vote for it, but simply didn't wish to be listed as co-sponsors.

Order your copy of Jerome Corsi's upcoming blockbuster, "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to Be President," autographed from the WND Superstore and be among the first get this historic book when it is released this spring.

The proposal, which also is being taken up in a number of other states, is highly specific and directly addresses the questions that have been raised by Barack Obama's occupancy of the White House. It says:



Read more: Game-changer! Arizona to pass 2012 eligibility law http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=255489#ixzz1CBXGXsXg

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=255489

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Points Based immigration a no go !

The Conservative and Labour Parties’ policy of “points based migration” is a total failure and “is an ineffective instrument for the task,” independent think tank Migrationwatch has announced.

According to a new report issued by that organisation, the overall number of visas issued has continued to rise since the introduction of the points based migration system (PBS), in spite of the recession.

“This has been driven by student numbers which have been increasing in recent years and have shown a faster rate of increase under PBS,” Migrationwatch said.

“Entry for work was in decline before the introduction of the PBS and has declined further since, mostly likely because of the economic downturn.

“Initial evidence suggests, therefore, that the PBS has not been effective in controlling immigration,” the report said.

The Migrationwatch report went on to analyse a number of data sets which clearly showed that the introduction of the PBS had had almost no effect in halting the Third World invasion of Britain.

Student numbers grew rapidly by 100,000 in the first year while, despite the worst recession in a generation, work permits have only fallen by 27,000 or 30 percent.

“An applicant for a PBS visa is awarded points for certain criteria such as salary and education. If the required number of points is reached then the visa is granted,” the Migrationwatch report said.

“This is intended to make the process clear and transparent and to ensure consistency. However a survey of UKBA border staff showed that 71 percent felt it had made the border less secure.

“This may be because the evidence to obtain points can be forged (e.g. education certificate) and there are hardly any interviews which can be essential for judging the authenticity of the applicant.

“For example, students need 40 points. 30 points are obtained if the college offers a place (by issuing them a Certificate of Acceptance of Studies) and 10 points are awarded for having enough maintenance funds.

“The college has a financial interest in offering the place and there is no interview to check that the applicant has a genuine interest in the subject matter of the course, has the required English language skills and intends to return when it ends,” it said.

One graph showed the number of highly skilled visas issued since 2006, the start of the Highly Skilled Migrants Programme, or HSMP (a precursor to PBS Tier 1).

“[The] numbers in this category have increased each year since its introduction. This growth has continued under the replacement of HSMP with PBS Tier 1,” said Migrationwatch.

“According to Home Office Research, 29 percent of a sample [group] were found in unskilled work and a further 46 percent were either unemployed or provided insufficient details.”

This means that of one test sample group of supposedly “highly-skilled immigrants,” some 75 percent were not working in the professional capacity through which they gained entry to Britain.

“There are also a significant number of people extending their leave to remain by switching to a PBS Tier 1 visa through the Post-Study Route which allows a graduate in any subject from more than 600 UK institutions the right to stay in the UK for two years and look for work, whatever the class of their degree,” the Migrationwatch report continued.

In 2009 34,000 graduates switched onto the Post-Study work visa.

“In 2009, the first year after the introduction of PBS Tier 4 visas there was a massive jump in student numbers to 468,000 (main entry).

The PBS system was introduced by the Labour Party and enthusiastically endorsed by the Conservative Party, which wrote it into its election manifesto by way of promising to “bring net migration down.”

http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/

Sunday, January 23, 2011

New DNA study shows benefits to homogenous societies- MSNBC HEALTH

This is a new scientific study which indicates that in order for people to be happy they need friends of similar DNA or genetic ancestry, and people seek spouses and friends of similar genetic makeup. This justifies the maintanence of a relatively homogenous population, which undermines pro mass immigration arguments like the so called " Rot weiss Rot Card".


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41083048/ns/health-behavior/


"Friends feel like family? You may be genetically tied
New finding may help explain the 'chemistry' friends feel, study suggests"


By Joan Raymond
msnbc.com contributor msnbc.com contributor
updated 1/17/2011 3:00:07 PM ET 2011-01-17T20:00:07
Share Print Font: + - You might have more in common with your BFF than a shared passion for football, politics, or kitty cats. Just like members of the same family, you and your "bestie" could be sharing some very compatible genes, according to a new study published Monday in PNAS, the journal of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences.

Researchers found that choosing folks to hang around with — and not choosing others — can be linked to specific genes. That genetic link provides the beginnings of a scientific explanation for the elusive quality of “chemistry” among friends, explains lead author James Fowler, a professor of medical genetics and political science at the University of California, San Diego.

“The whole idea of friendships is very weird,” says Fowler, whose research focuses on social networks, health and the biological basis of behavior. That’s because humans are one of the only species that forms long-term unions simply because we like each other, not just because we need to reproduce.

Health highlights Sip green tea before your walk to burn more fat
Daily motivation to get your diet and fitness back on track in 2011. What's holding you back?
Allergic to orgasms? Sad story has happy ending Online diet pills often contain dangerous ingredients Hospitals try to curb emergency room crowding Dude wears unwashed skinny jeans for 15 months To analyze an association between genes and human relationships, the researchers, with support from the National Institute on Aging, gathered data from two large studies: the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, and a replication study in an independent sample collected from the Framingham Heart Study. Both of these long-term studies asked participants about their friendship ties and social networks.

Like birds of a feather that actually do flock together, individuals who carry a particular genetic marker for a gene called DRD2, a dopamine receptor that is associated with alcoholism, among other traits, tend to make friends with other DRD2-positive people, according to the study results. Conversely, those who lacked the gene tended to form friendships with people who were also DRD2-negative.

Opposites also attract
But the scientists also found that when it comes to our genes, opposites may indeed attract. According to the research, folks who carried a version of a gene called CYP2A6, associated with an “open” personality, made friends with folks who didn’t carry it.

This idea of heterophily, or the love of the different, existing simultaneously with homophily, the love of the same, “should not be true at the same time,” says Fowler, who believes ongoing research will show that different biomechanisms, such as the sense of smell, might also come into play as we form friendships.

The researchers believe that friendships, when viewed from the genetic level, could provide a better understanding of the way that our genes may shape our social environment, and the way that social environment influences our behaviors.

Continued research may even show that a kind of feedback process happens, in which a person’s genes lead to choosing friends with particular genotypes. That, in turn, may actually influence the expression of a person’s own genes, giving rise to the idea that humans are “metagenomic,” says co-author Dr. Nicholas Christakis, a professor of medicine and sociology at Harvard Medical School.

“Humans live our lives in social networks in a sea of genes,” says Christakis. “And the fact that we’re showing that it’s not just our own genes, but (also) the genes of other people (having) relevance in our lives, has a lot of implications.”

© 2011 msnbc.com. Reprints

Professor Rushton also gives comments




A Pro-White US President ?

It seems Americans have woke up from their third world Obama experiment and the next president will not be another Amnesty boy Bush, but possibly a genuine pro White president, against mass immigration, which could set an example for the west and countries in turmoil considering mass immigration and psychopath women like Fekter.

http://nation.foxnews.com/2012-presidential-race/2011/01/23/romney-wins-new-hampshire-republican-straw-poll#


"Politics
January 23, 2011

Romney Wins New Hampshire Republican Straw Poll
Fire it up 6
139 CommentsEmail Facebook Twitter
AP
While no one has declared their presidential campaign yet, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney emerged as the winner Saturday of a New Hampshire Republican straw poll that aimed to gauge what kind of support early contenders have among the party faithful.

Romney received 35 percent support from the state party-sanctioned straw poll that was organized by ABC News and WMUR-TV.

Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, who like Romney previously ran for president, came in second place with 11 percent. Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who visits the state this week, had 8 percent, with 2008 vice presidential nominee former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin at 7 percent.

Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota and Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina each earned 5 percent.

In 2008, Romney came in second in New Hampshire's GOP primary behind eventual nominee John McCain. Romney has been leading the early polls of possible GOP contenders in 2012.

But some very prominent potential candidates didn't score so well with the New Hampshire Republicans. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich earned 3 percent of the vote as did Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels and former Arkansas Gov. and 2008 candidate Mike Huckabee."


Mitt Romney has signed the executive order as governor of MA ordering the police to apprehend illegal immigrants -- long before Arizona. If a bill was placed on his desk by a GOP house bringing down massively the immigration quota, he would likely sign. He is also on record opposing amnesty.




Ron Paul is simply Brilliant and the ideal choice. He opposes the 14th ammendmant anchor baby loophole, he voted to reduce mass immigration in the past. His son Rand was critical of the civil rights act. He also called for state secession.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

CANNOT RELY ON FOREIGN WORKERS DUE TO LOW STANDARDS

An excellent piece from BusinessWeek written by an Indian, incidentally, seems pertinent by detailing the lower standards of foreign vocational training and degrees. Can you imagine how bad relying on mass immigration to fill large labor shortages or replace Austrian workers entirely would be ?


"My research team at Duke looked in depth at the engineering education of China and India. We documented that these countries now graduate four to seven times as many engineers as does the U.S.The quality of these engineers, however, is so poor that most are not fit to work as engineers; their system of rote learning handicaps those who do get jobs, so it takes two to three years for them to achieve the same productivity as fresh American graduates.As a result, significant proportions of China's engineering graduates end up working on factory floors and Indian industry has to spend large sums of money retraining its employees."


http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2011/tc20110112_006501.htm