Is Newt Gingrich A Genocidal Slave Driver ?

Gingrich has got to go. It's Time. That's it.!

Newt Gingrich immigration program is a disaster. It does nothing to help people but rather creates even more unemployment. It is basically a repeat of the failed 1986 amnesty but no path to citizenship and much worse. You need to do everything in your power to defeat Newt gingrich. He is deceptive and will destroy this country, even more than Obama with his jobs killing and unfair programs. You may even need Radical third party alternatives, but I hope not.

He does not mention once any time of mandatory employer verification system, but merely a guest worker program, so not only can a business hire legal sub standard labor, but also continue to hire illegal labor. He say greater penalty, but it is already illegal to hire an illegal from the '86 law, so what difference would a penalty make, and what would the point be if the employer had no easy verification system, or a mandatory one  ? The businesses would just ignore the guest worker program and continue to hire illegal anyway. Furthermore, why sponsor a guest worker program in the economy anyway ?


I also dont't see great value in English only as an official language proposal coming from Gingrich, most states have a law like that anyway. And with the massive numbers of guest workers and immigrants he wants to bring in, that would be detrimental to have english only, because the workers do speak spanish and will anyway. Newt would also never apply English only where it counts like the voting right act provision for bi lingual ballots etc.. Although English only on the federal level well done by someone like Dr Paul would be beneficial and avoid the snags.


His website calls for teaching immigrants history, but they are already taught "history". This can do nothing. Furthermore, I would imagine the history they are taught is Newt's version of PC non sense. I doubt they would pick up a book and See Eisenhower, FDR, or Huber's immigration policy which is not too "compassionate". Newt Certainly left that out in his falsified version of events. That policy is merely a clever disguise to mask the fact that illegal alien children cost the tax payer billions, and with his guest worker program, the states would be mandated to pick up the tab even more. Furthermore, once again he contradicts himself with such a policy when he says he is against the DOE and any mandate on the states against the 10th Ammendmant.

I also think the idea of allowing young illegals to join the military is absurd. In this economy people with misdemeanors or even a dismissed felony for harassment, ADD, a bad knee or something are being tunred away for service. Why now allow illegal aliens to join the military ? Is this a sign that perpetual warfare is sacrosanct and if you join some REMF unit in the military the illegal is magically equal to people like me and my family who fought in most of these country's majors wars past and present in the military ? I don't think so. Illegal immigrants children also have a higher ASVAB failure rate. Do you want the US military to be the French foreign legion ? Or is illegal aliens in the military some tool to terrorize american citizens so they can be used in the indefinite detention programs and FEMA camps in this country in case a sufficient number of Whites refuse to partake. ? There is also the fact the certain MOS require citizenship anyway,as illegals and non citizens can rarely get a security clearance. not to mention the fact that this idea DOES contradict his other promise not to put illegals at the front of the line for citizenship.


His amnesty program is also absurd. It might not even be legal to create a slave caste with no citizen or welfare rights. he also says that a person who has been in the usa 25 or more years should not be deported or an old lady. But why would an old not want Social security and assistance or prove they are not dependent on welfare, that by default screens out the elderly and sick and leaves the younger "rootless" types with amnesty. And the 24 year rule also means any illegal from 1990 to present gets to stay here. The 11 million prsently here is also a lie, there are far more. There is also the fact that even a small amnesty for some means millions. And an amnesty program would cost billions and anger many communities who are against this causing further division. Allowing a community to decide the law is also basically mob rule. Why not let the community decide what to do with all criminals then ? He also says all illegal aliens get amnesty until congress creates an amnesty program. That invalidates all law enforcement placing people in danger and negates the state anti-immigrant laws he claims to support. And eventually the illegals amnestied wether he likes or not via democrat executive order or the next dem administration as the apparatus is already in place easy.Mexicans can also just leave to their home right next door. What state do we have ?

His humanitarian concerns are bogus. He is basically creating a class of slaves like his southern ancestors probably did. His humanitarian concern is just the desires of the chamber of commerce and nothing more. And to say his party is the party of the family ignores all the suicides, divorces, widows etc.. caused by the wars which he has no problem with and ignore the old GOP policy under eisenhower ( funny he mentions ww2 in his plan) which systematically deported them and kept them at bay until the late 70's. He also didn't object to child labor amongst other things. His references to reagan are also absurd. He admits the 86 amnesty was a failure. There were also fare fewer illegals at the time and Reagan said it was a one time deal. Even the pope says illegals can be deported. Reagan also gave a pro-waffen SS speech with US ww2 vets at Bitburg Airbase in Germany in the 80's and went to Alabam and talked about states rights at a famous civil rights landmark. He also almost refues to honor MLK and continued funding to apartheid south Africa. Reagan also dealt with a democratic controlled congress in 86. What about that Reagan ? And if you want to talk American historical figures why not Go back To Jefferson or don't go there at all ? Furthermore, Humanitarian Aid with repatriation can be considered as a cheaper alternative to amnesty.

I am also disgusted that he presents a false dilemma by saying they all need to be deported or amnestied. One must do neither, but rather attrition through enforcement. Employer sanctions and E-verify, empower the states, cut funding for sanctuary cities, end birth right citizenship,  etc..They will leave automatically. Not to mention the fact that he is saying :we have to deport" as if anyone was trying, in light of his plan would it not be better to even do nothing than pay so much to set up deportation systems for a limited number of people, then have to supposedly deport the rest afterwards anyway ?

His legal immigration programs are also horrible. Not only did the bipartisan Jordan comission reccomend drastic cuts in the 90's under his watch, but that was in a GOOD economy. There is no shortage of engineers in this country, but beyond that he wants to give foreign grads green cards for the popular majors lie business which is an attack on my family and friends at an at an individual level. And while giving so many foreigners green cards after college, he does nothing about if not promote affirmative action, which burdens and undermines excllence in many top schools thus helping to create any "brain shortage". White students will be locked out of most higher ed and all americans will face a flooded job market after graduation. There is also no shortage of computer programmers or many of those industries he mentions. H1B is also a fraud and a source of illegal immigration. He also says nothing about the 1.5 million legal immigrants who come every year and often go on welfare. That was recommended to be reduced by the Jordan commision. And even John Mccain was talking substantial legal immigration cuts when he was promoting amnesty. Temporary legal status for illegal kids also means possible college enrollment which is the same as the dream act.

The border emphasis is also absurd. Fences are ineffective. The mains source of illegals are visa overstays, something he wants more of and wants to do nothing about. A secure border will do nothing as long as there is an employment and welfare magnet which he wants to leave in place. He also shiftes the guest worker burden on to the tax payer and expands government with these programs.The guest workers will have anchor babies here, their kkids must also be subsidizes in public schools by local communities according to federal law. That contradicts his balanced budget ammendmant and pledge for low taxes and even contradicts the Krebbs card plan he likes.

I also think he is a total hypocrite of poor personal qualities. He lives in a very wealthy predominantly White area of GA, but does not believe anyone else should obviously. He talks down on the confederates for slavery, but promotes it himself both in China and here with illegal labor. His knowledge of history obviously stinks. He says he is pro-family but had countless extramartial affairs. He changed his positon more times than Romney or anyone. He promotes affirmative action, but won't step down from his professor job as an older white male and allow a Black or latino preferential treatment to get that position. He sounds more like Ted Kennedy than anyone. He is probably be extorted right now with all the baggage he has. He also is a obese. Worst of all he uses guilt trips to coerce people into supporting his policies while lying about his true intentions.

He also supported Kosovo independence and even advocates NATO supression and bombing of Serbia, even keeping out Serbs from their traditional lands with border guards and barbed wire. However what about the right-wing groups that may wish to have a separate homeland in north America to escape actual real genocidal policies he imposes ? Zogby was reporting 23% want secession in north America peacefully. How does he feel about them ? He also wrote a book promoting the concept of corporate globalism in which nations don't exist but only business zones in addition to the horrible immigration policies.But supports israel with 8 million. If someone can get together enough people who want a peacful homeland in north America would could they be granted such ? Why it be wrong or not preferable ?

I also think the idea of a "Latino vote" is absurd. They are a very small part of the electorate. Many hispanics are very proud of their country of origin while living in America. There are also stark differences between Latin ethnic groups like Cubans and Argentinians who are mostly White Mexicans and El Salvadorians etc.. I know from personal experience with my Argentinian and Cuban friends and Mexicans and Salvadorians I know not to get them confused. And many states have voter ID now.And if they so important, why not just enforce the damn immigration laws instead of amnesty and pass ore voter id laws. etc.. It is also counter productive to pander to them and promote their ethnic identities. It only forces them to be more anti-america. I also think democracy is failing as most polls show the public against immigration, but nothing is done but betrayal and inaction. There seems to be no difference between the two parties. It has a elitist polyarchy at best, and dictatorship at worst sadly.Furthermore, how would a pro-immigration president carry Ohio, PA, or AZ which are Reagan dem country ?

Even the democrats are praising Gingrich and they will praise him even more with Ads in key states in 2012. I sure as hell won't vote for him and many others won't while he advocates genocide. He is far behind Obama in polls. He has immigration endorsements from Gutierrez D-il La Raza, DNC, and even copies Obama administrative amnesty policies. etc.. I think it would even be better for Newt not do anything about immigration besides let the states do their job, if God Forbid he gets to office. That would be the End of this nation. I wonder how those chamber of commerce types that think it is ok to go against the majority and actually write America's immigration laws would feel if their voting cattle walked away and actually had a credible third party or seceeded ?

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/11/29/9099594-house-democrat-calls-gingrichs-immigration-remarks-step-in-right-direction


A terrorist law from newt because that is what he is:
http://www.newt.org/solutions/immigration


PS. if you think their is a labor shortage ?What happened to chain gangs picking fruits and convict labor ? Or even meanignful welfare reform that forces people to do any job ?

The US Citizens he does not care about:

Why are Republicans scared of Occupy Wall Street ? Most could be sex partners.

Michele Bachmann And Glenn Beck were on the radio talking about "big bad occupy wall street" and how we need to nuke iran, and self identified as a zionist literally and calling herself a "christian". I wonder if they are deliberately deceptive or grossly misinformed especially on their bizzare fear of occupy wall street.

Are you anti-OWS types afraid that they may take over and institute a racist anti white government with discriminatory hiring and aid practices ? That sounds alot like the current government which many of you seem to approve of due to the fact that you have ignored the issue, even when it is more unpopular than anytime in history. No ?

Are you afraid that Occupy wall street might take over the government and create an extraordinary liberal one with tons of social programs and keep taxes high, still running a trillion and trillions dollar deficit ? No, we already have that and the GOP approves. 

Are you afraid they might put the currency in the hands of a private central bank that just sh*ts money that is basically worthless ? We already have the FED bank. You guys already have that. And Bachmann is cute saying we need a gold standard, but didn't mention the FED. :-)

Are you afraid that OWS will bring 1.5 million foreigners legally every year that live in ghettos and displace the traditional population mostly all voting for socialism adding to the OWS ranks ? Open the nation up to invasion and give them birth right citizenship ? We already have that silly. Who cares about 70% or "99%" against that ? Right comrades ? Maybe even bring 1 billion people here destroying the environment ? 

Are you afraid that they will regulate the free market and destroy capitalism ? Hey Hey, we got plenty of that. We have crony capitalism too. 


Are you afraid they will set up a police state with surveillance and internet regulation, violation of the constitution ? We have already have that including the patriot act and such. Thank you W. 

So What the Hell are you afraid of GOP ??? 

oh, could it be that they are not blood thirsty and are opposed to war. ? That is very very very bad. 2 million dead is not enough. I guess. 

So, GOP tell me why you are scared of occupy wall street. You should arrange a 60's style hippie style LGBT, feminist and sexual liberation advocacy orgy. Some swinging etc.. You guys are close and the morals of Cain and Newt are right up there I guess. And you don't need to bring your own tents, you can just...invite them to the white house. I am sure as you are the "men/ women with power" for all those with that fetish. ;-)

Here are some real non hypocritical Jews doing the right thing at Occupy Wall Street:

Why I now support Legalized Marijuana in the USA like Dr. Ron Paul

Why I changed my mind and support Marijuana Legalization like Ron Paul 

Marijuana or "Ganja" as they call it. is a hot topic, often discussed, but unfortunately not discussed enough or in the right context. Marijuana is a drug that is consumed. It produces effects similar to intoxication. I personally have not used like many advocates for decriminalization and i'm "straight edge". Although I am very right-wing, I support the legalization after the study Ron Paul ideology. Some support legalization, while others do not and although a ban presently exists, there are strong reasons for dismantling these laws rather than allow this prohibition to continue. I support the decriminalization for practical, ethical and scientific reasons etc..

First of all the argument that marijuana is inherently and purely unhealthy is false. Marijuana is actually is just like cigarettes, inhaled from smoke. But without the nicotine and added ingredients and addiction. It is also completely organic and natural. It has proven medical benefits for patients. It is even rated less harmful than alcohol or tobacco by many world renowned researchers. The effects are also temporary like intoxication. And studies about addiction or long term damage are inconclusive at worst. The gateway drug idea is also redciulous, which is like saying alcohol is a gateway drug. I know a girl from school that smokes it and she WOULD NEVER stick a heroine need into her body or snort coke. Marijuana can also be eaten in brownies as a snack with less effect or harm than tobacco or alcohol.

And when we consider the topic of cigarettes, why do we not consider the special interest groups that suppress the legalization of the drug ? The tobacco companies spend millions supporting candidates who support them and not legalization. John Behoner in particular, a tough opponent of legalization was passing out tobacco checks on the house floor. The DARE campaign as you may know is against "drugs", including marijuana, but they refuse to point to the dangers of tobacco as it is funded by big tobacco. The Tobacco and other corporate collusion against Marijuana is one of the sadest examples of crony capitalism on earth.

In addition the the Big Tobacco imposed restrictions of no value, the "moral" arguments do not hold weight. In christianity there are numerous examples of ancient Jews and christians using the drug. I also question the christian idea that marijuana is bad, while alcohol is ok. Some muslims also interpret the Koran to allow Hashish and not Alcohol. Many Ancient people's of the biblical and ancient era also used such as the indo-europeans scythians. cannabis plants have been found in Egypt with mummies etc.. Shakespere and many Western figures have also used Cannabis. In the USA and West Cannabis only became illegal in the 1900's when the Temprance movement emerged and Big Tobacco was growing much bigger.


The federal Ban on marijuana is something small government conservatives need to oppose, especially the Tea Party. The "war on drugs" has cost the government millions and contributed the deficit tremendously. It has violated constitutional rights. The beauracracy to fight the drug has expanded the federal government and created agencies such as the DEA. The goals and purpose of the war on drugs are questionable. Why would it be necessary to exterminate an entire species of plant or raid the home of someone with a single plant of pot in their home ? And even if one supports big government is a pot plant our priority over fighting the Al Quaida you claim to be so concerned about ? Mant Law enforcement personnel also want to see the drug legalized. Lives are also destroyed everyday and our prisons overflow because people use it.

The anti-matijuana laws have also had no effect and even negative effects. Growing up and in college marijuana was just as common as cigarettes if not more. It is also not impossible if not terribly easy to get marijuana. All one needs to do is get seeds and some dirt and water, wallah. Drug cartels and the underground economy has also emerged from the strict marijuana laws, which threatens many people. Many marxist paramilitary governments and armies like FARC and the FNC are funded by drug sales to the USA. The Taliban was also getting rich selling it to us etc..Prohibition was a disaster and so is criminalization of marijuana. Once the underground economy dissapears, the drug money would not flow to mexico and cartels but stay in our economy. Making marijuana illegal also means that the law cannot focus on severely harmful drugs like Heroine.

The effects and benefits of legalization would be enormous. Besides increasing freedom, ending drug crimes etc.. it would help people medically, economically, socially. People can solve their medical and social problems with it. It would also aid in job creation. Many people can become entrepreneurs, grow small businesses and be employed in related industries like hemp factories and farms. Garden shops and potteries would also flourish. Doctors could give low income people needing care marijuana instead of anti-depressants and tranquilizers. It would also increase tourism tremendously. The US also needs to compete with countries that have already started legalization like the Netherlands, Canada, etc.. The GOP could also have a social just / diversity / LGBT positive issue in supporting legalization, something they seem to want to be these days. OWS also supports legalization.

The legalization process can be done in a slow and good way. The anti-marijuana laws on the FEDERAL level need to get tossed. The states that want to get regulate can either by banning, or state licensing, which ensures people can get legal drugs and safe drugs. Communities that wish to ban would have more authority to do so, while those favoring less restriction can have none. There is also the hypocrisy of the fact that a state MUST enforce FEDERAL drug laws, but a state like AZ or AL can't even enforce the federal immigration law. And even Lincoln Chaffee types would jump in against AZ and AL. etc..We should wonder why if Sodomy is a constitutional right to privacy , why not a puff which does NOT give you AIDs HIV chances and such ?? LOGIC ??

The process of legalization has already begun. Many states have ballot initiatives to allow the citizens to decide their own drug laws that pass. Medical Marijuana is now becoming more popular. Obama has even flirted with the idea of legalization. Ron PAul has also brought in legislation with congressman barney Frank which shows repeal of the anti-marijuana laws would be both bi-partisan and diverse. Polls also show widespread support for legalization, even in nations such as Canada. It is a winning issue for all. You also need to overcome the idea that marijuana is "taboo" from years of indoctrination by Big Tobacco, media And party orthodoxy.

In conclusion, hemp is not so bad. I don't use it but believe it should be legalized. It is for our constitutional rights. It is for limited government. It is for less crime. Decriminalization is politically advantageous and popular. The decriminalization is bi-partisan. It would also create jobs and help everyone.


How it works in smoke form from NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg8wrzmIdyI

Congressman Paul (R-TX) and Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA)  support legalization:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHBCsPYuKIs

Economist and world famous Investor Peter Schiff wants legalization:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3hfDyEJsxA

Most People Support Legalization in polls:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/150149/Record-High-Americans-Favor-Legalizing-Marijuana.aspx

Other sponsors of Marijuana freedom: Governor and GOP presidential candidate Gary Johnson of New Mexico, Navy Seal, celebrity and Governor Jesse Ventura of Minesotta, Dr and Senator Rand Paul, DR Ron Paul, congressman Frank of MA and DNC, California doctors association, US. Surgeon General Elders, 

LA NOIR : non PC fun for White Nationalists ?

What an Amazing Non PC discovery I have found. Get it for your children.

So, I have an X Box and from time to time I like to play video games. I prefer historically themed games, crime / law, some military shooters, RPG,s strategy, etc..I am quite knowledgeable about these games. But recently my Steam account stopped working, thus my favorite game 'til now Shogun total war 2 stopped as well. thus I am back to x box and have purchased an awesome game called "LA Noire" from Rockstar games. This game is all round great, and surprisingly non PC.

Full Trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYym1U226M

The game starts in 1947-1950 in LA. It is a free roam style game, so you can wander around. The city Of LA is recreated along with the original historical cars, weapons and every other item you can think of. Your character is a detective and WW2 USMC Pacific theatre veteran, a lieutenant from the 6th Marine Battalion , who is notorious for a mysterious massacre on Okinawa. Occasional you see flashbacks from his experiences on screen such as storming a Japanese Artillery position. He also earned a silver star. He is now top cop in the LAPD. He rises through the ranks to detective working various cases ranging from Traffic to Arson. The main organized criminals are the Jewish Mafia lead by Mikey Cohen. The cases are based on history and include Hollywood child sex rings, serial killers, insurance fraud, Arson-murder, Morphine addiction, large plots and conspiracies etc.. You also can stop street crimes that often end up in car chases or shoot outs on the street. Although crimes are still present, much less in number than today, which is also reflected in the game.

Flashbacks:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib4IvBq7Vhc

The game's Historical detail not only in the geography and technology but the demographics and social situation as well is astounding . In post war LA, almost every man is a veteran from the pacific theater. There is alot of racial awareness in society. The Us immigration laws are still based on ethnic quotas, so there are very few asians or Latinos in the city, and Few Blacks mainly in WATTS, so the 1947 demographic profile leaves LA about 90% White and with a small statewide population. The Police also and society also have no problem calling people racial names, and the official term for a Black person is not African American, but rather just Negro. There is also fighting between Jews against christians. Communists are also picked up and charged with other crimes.

Leftist Jew interrogated by PD :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObOU4troQBE&feature=related

The Political and social situation is also well documented. On your car radio you hear original old news broadcasts relating to the Red Scare, Joe Mccarthy and HUAC investigating Hollywood. Truman also speaks on the radio, along with other politicians, and surprisingly they pray in speeches and talk of God. You also hear really nice old songs. You also get global news like the communist take over of poland, Chinese civil war, Homosexuality and adultery are still illegal and due to the easy going demographics, the PD has plenty of time to investigate them. The main character also gets popped / arrested for a extramarital relationship he has with a German woman from Germany who is also a singer and later turns out to have been Nazi in the war and is a heroine in the game.

The Technology differences are well represented in the game and accurate. There are no 2 way radios for police, but rather a one way radio to receive dispatches from the station. To call HQ, you need to use a street phone reserved for Police and fire. There is also amazing detailed weapons from the era to use: the BAR, Thompson with a 50 - 100 round drum mag, the Browning High power pistol, unique for the time with it's 14 round magazine, the 1911 pistol, and the S&W model 10. You can also keep a Ithaca M37 shotgun in you car trunk. Civilians also have weapons and you see them shooting robbers and such. They have the M1 Garand, but unfortunately not the M1 Carbine which would have been ideal for police work but also has 30 round clip. a flamethrower from ww2 also found. There is also brass knuckles and switchblades, plus other weapons you can't use. If you go inside a house, you also see like singer sewing machines and giant wood radios. etc.. Police tactics are also different: more likely to use force, no miranda, harsher interogations. Also the effects are realistic, in that if you shoot someone from close rang with a shotgun their guts explode, but each weapon also has a range for it's caliber. You also need to hit someone in their vital organs or head repeatedly when you shoot them with bulllets, if not they get up again.

This game as GREAt all in all. I think it is comprable if not better than GTA iv, Red Dead Redemption and all in it's class. I cannot stop playing the game even the same case again. I just wish there were hundreds and not like 25 cases. I also like the history. I wish I could live in this era and hope America will be like it was in that time again. But until it gets that way, i'll keep playing XBox...And definitly pick this game up for the kids, as they may learn something good.